Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 28.06.2025 03:33

Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Is the Kia Tasman the ugliest ute of all time?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
PC modding repository Nexus Mods has a new owner - The Verge
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
What’s next?
Has any man licked his wife's vagina while another man had sex with her?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What would you do if you were lost at sea in the Florida Keys?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Adam Sandler will cast Derrick Henry in a movie if he rushes for 2,000 yards - NBC Sports